Could we get an indication when this may be scheduled?
Matt Walter
Team•
Aug 23, 2021
Urszula Richards: It's not on our immediate Roadmap, but is planned for us to look at in the future. It's unlikely to be this year.
Matt Jones
•
Feb 3, 2020
I'd be wary of removing this security feature without putting some safeguards in. If WebApps can be submitted with Front End forms, then also allowing them to output and render Liquid could be dangerous- including it would allow attackers to render GraphQL queries and mutations. I'm guessing you'd restrict it to Liquid includes only?
Khy Tran
•
Nov 19, 2019
Is this the same as adding a Web App within a Web App? If so, can we get this pushed up by any chance. Nothing worse than not being able to reference another Web App, especially when we're using Web App data source fields!
Matt Walter
Team•
Nov 19, 2019
Khy Tran: Being able to have a multiline/WYSIWYG text field that outputs dynamic content. For example, being able to write {% include 'webapp', id: '123', type: 'list' -%} and it actually render the list view. At the moment it would output that literally.
Helen Eichel
•
May 27, 2020
Matt Walter: Matt - would that include being able to include any liquid code into WebApp text fields? Thanks
Matt Walter
Team•
May 27, 2020
Helen Eichel: Yes, exactly that.
Helen Eichel
•
May 27, 2020
Matt Walter: That's great. Any idea when this will kick in? Thanks!
Log in to comment and vote
Comments9
Apr 6, 2022
Urszula Richards
Aug 23, 2021
Could we get an indication when this may be scheduled?
Matt Walter
Aug 23, 2021
Urszula Richards: It's not on our immediate Roadmap, but is planned for us to look at in the future. It's unlikely to be this year.
Matt Jones
Feb 3, 2020
I'd be wary of removing this security feature without putting some safeguards in. If WebApps can be submitted with Front End forms, then also allowing them to output and render Liquid could be dangerous- including it would allow attackers to render GraphQL queries and mutations. I'm guessing you'd restrict it to Liquid includes only?
Khy Tran
Nov 19, 2019
Is this the same as adding a Web App within a Web App? If so, can we get this pushed up by any chance. Nothing worse than not being able to reference another Web App, especially when we're using Web App data source fields!
Matt Walter
Nov 19, 2019
Khy Tran: Being able to have a multiline/WYSIWYG text field that outputs dynamic content. For example, being able to write
{% include 'webapp', id: '123', type: 'list' -%}and it actually render the list view. At the moment it would output that literally.Helen Eichel
May 27, 2020
Matt Walter: Matt - would that include being able to include any liquid code into WebApp text fields? Thanks
Matt Walter
May 27, 2020
Helen Eichel: Yes, exactly that.
Helen Eichel
May 27, 2020
Matt Walter: That's great. Any idea when this will kick in? Thanks!